Causes, Types of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Free Essay Example, 2000 words

More than 90% of people diagnosed with CJD are suffering from this type of CJD and it is mainly found in people aged between 45 to 75. There are no specific symptoms for this CJD (Shah et al. , 2009); however, some early symptoms such as depression may be present but it can quickly progress into confusion and problems of memory which is commonly observed in dementia, followed by loss of balance and coordination along with progressive blindness (Piouti et al. , 2012). Familial or genetic CJD is one of the rare genetic condition in which the person s genes are inherited from one parent who causes the protein to get mutated into a prion in later stages of life that trigger the symptoms of CJD. In other words, it appears in families that have an abnormal gene. About 7% of cases have this type of CJD. In order to diagnose it, a blood test is done; a person having this abnormal gene has 50% chance of transmitting it to children. The other rare form of CJD is Fatal Familial Insomnia (FFI) and Gerstmann-Str ussler-Scheinker (GSS); both of these are rarely found in people (Brand et al. , 2006). We will write a custom essay sample on Causes, Types of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/page It can even occur with blood transfusion in which variant CJD is transmitted from one person to other. Once the symptoms are identified, the disease spreads quickly in the body (Tattum et al. , 2010). In many of the cases, classic CJD looks similar to various other dementias; the disease comes on in a fast mode and then declines the ability to think as symptoms start appearing.

In 2003, George W. Bush invaded Iraq, believing that the...

In 2003, George W. Bush invaded Iraq, believing that the country’s president Saddam Hussein was using weapons of mass destruction against the people of Iraq. This war started a larger war, named â€Å"Operation Iraqi Freedom†. The consequence of this inessential war were the lives of over 4000 Americans, over 1 trillion dollars in spending, and superfluous tension in the Middle East. Though there are many theories on why Bush invaded Iraq, the one that makes the most sense is overconfidence. Simply put, George W. Bush and his administration had faulty and ambiguous evidence, but their overconfidence and pride lead them to put the war into action anyway. This self-assuredness lead to the expiration of Bush’s tenure and the broken hearts of many†¦show more content†¦Mr. Bea talks about British Petroleum, which is most known for its oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. â€Å"Bea pointed to the congressional testimony, that BP ignored problems with a dead batt ery, leak cement job and loose hydraulic fittings† (Borenstein). Here, BP’s excessive pride lead to improper thinking, BP specifically thought that it could continue to ship and drill oil with a variety of known problems. In the end, BP faced a lot of criticism and worst of all, the Gulf of Mexico is now perilously polluted with oil. Many people like to believe that pride is something noble, something to treasure, but that is a false truism. Pride will actually bring a person to make false judgments and thinking, which will lead to the falling apart of the general public. Apart from causing fabricated beliefs, hubris will cause individuals to be so confident that they set completely impractical goals. One example is best expressed by Mr. Lee Clarke, who is an author and professor at Rutgers University. Clarke made up an example of unrealistic goals involving British Petroleum’s drilling, saying â€Å"we have been doing this every day, every year, week in, week out, so next week we go to 5000 feet, it will be like last week when we went to 300 feet† (Borenstein). BP’s overconfidence has undoubtedly caused them to set ridiculous expectations. In this scenario, BP is tryingShow MoreRelatedMarketing Mistakes and Successes175322 Words   |  702 PagesUniversity JOHN WILEY SONS, INC. VICE PRESIDENT PUBLISHER EXECUTIVE EDITOR ASSISTANT EDITOR PRODUCTION MANAGER PRODUCTION ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE MARKETING MANAGER ASSISTANT MARKETING MANAGER MARKETING ASSISTANT DESIGN DIRECTOR SENIOR DESIGNER SENIOR MEDIA EDITOR George Hoffman Lise Johnson Carissa Doshi Dorothy Sinclair Matt Winslow Amy Scholz Carly DeCandia Alana Filipovich Jeof Vita Arthur Medina Allison Morris This book was set in 10/12 New Caledonia by Aptara ®, Inc

Jeannette Winterson Weight Free Essays

In Jeanette Winterson’s novel Weight, the author demonstrates how myths have modern personal relevancies and can encourage each reader to investigate the three main subject matters in their lives; boundaries, freedom, and guilt. The numerous references to walls throughout the novel signify the boundaries, which make Atlas strive for freedom. Winterson’s Weight, is a modern rewrite on an old myth of Atlas and Heracles, and the challenges they endure can be interpreted by individual readers for personal relevancies. We will write a custom essay sample on Jeannette Winterson Weight or any similar topic only for you Order Now Atlas, a father of daughters, is faced with the burden of carrying the world on his shoulders. This can represent a feeling as if one is carrying a world of stress and guilt on one’s shoulders and conscience. Heracles, the stronger of the two, takes the weight of the world from Atlas momentarily and struggles to carry the burden when he sends Atlas to pick three golden apples from the Garden of Hesperides. For example, boundaries are represented by walls throughout Winterson’s novel, not just the physical structures but also any other representation of a boundary. Winterson conceives the body itself as a boundary, in the sense that the skin stands between a human and everything else and although Atlas feels trapped in his own body, he escapes into his own mind to ponder the philosophies of boundaries and the universe. Winterson writes, â€Å"At last I began to hear something, I found that where the world was close to my ears, I could hear everything. I could hear conversation, parrots squawking, donkeys braying. I heard the rushing of underground rivers and the crackles of fires lighted. Each sound became a meaning and soon I began to de-code the world. †¦ As the dinosaurs crawl through my hair and volcanic eruptions pock my face, I find I am become a part of what I must bear. There is no longer Atlas and the world; there is only the World Atlas. Travel me and I am continents. I am the journey you must make. † (p. 24). This can represent feeling stuck within self, feeling trapped and almost tortured to find freedom. Although boundaries are a very strong representation within the novel, there is a connection between the walls and the freedom of nothingness. Atlas constantly is escaping into the limitless of his imagination, where he is not punished for wanting the forbidden. The Gods hoped that by punishing Atlas to be trapped in his body under the weight of the world that they would contain his mind, and they were mistaken. This can be interpreted as the strength and perseverance from within an individual. The wall that Atlas builds around the Garden of Hesperides is constructed in such a way that it explains freedom and nothingness that can sometimes be unappreciated. Winterson writes, â€Å"I built a walled garden, a temenos, a sacred space. I lifted the huge stones with my own hands and piled them carefully, as a goatherd would, leaving tiny gaps to let the wind through. A solid wall is easily collapsed. My mother stirring in her sleep could do as much. A wall well built with invisible spaces will allow the winds that rage against it to pass through. When the earth underneath it trembles, the spaces make room for movement and settlement. The wall stands. The wall’s strength is not in the stones but in the spaces between the stones. It’s a joke against me I think, that for all my strength and labour, the wall relies on nothing . Write it more substantially – NOTHING. † (p. 16). On the contrary, carrying the world doesn’t only make one feel trapped, it also feels as if one is carrying stress and guilt on their conscience, which feels as heavy as the world on one’s shoulders. Heracles is a representation of this when he sends Atlas to pick the golden apples from the Garden of Hesperides, and takes the weight of the world while Atlas travels. Heracles suffers while holding up the world. She writes â€Å"Meanwhile, Heracles was not happy. The world was much heavier than he had guessed. His strength lay in action not in endurance. He liked a short sharp fight, a good dinner and sleep. His body was as strong as Atlas’s, but his nature was not. Hera was right about him there. Heracles’s strength was a cover for his weakness. † (p. 58). While Heracles is holding up the weight of the world, he begins to think of murdering his own children, and all the brutal sexual abuse he has committed on women. This is a very strong moment for readers. When one uses their strength to such exhaustion, physically and emotionally, they tend to think about the wrong doings, and stress within their life and can no longer cope. Winterson shows this by writing, â€Å"Heracles was more afraid now than he had been in his whole life. He could accept any challenge except the challenge of no challenge. He knew himself through combat. He defined himself by opposition. When he fought, he could feel his muscles work, and the blood pumping through his body. Now he felt nothing but the weight of the world Atlas was right, it was too heavy for him. He couldn’t bear it. He couldn’t bear this slowing turning solitude. † (p. 71). In conclusion, humans need both freedom and boundaries. One may think they want freedom and despise boundaries, but to have no limitations and have complete freedom can actually be a burden itself. Humans need the weight of boundaries to keep from drifting away from reality. For Jeanette Winterson, weight can be equated with retelling a myth. The â€Å"I want to tell the story again† theme applies as Winterson writes about how you can tell a story numerous times, but need to stay within the boundaries of the original. For others, this novel may open up a new way of thinking, and coping with personal challenges one can face in modern day. Jeanette Winterson’s Weight is an authentic retelling of a classic myth, including the use of science facts and personal relevancies. Between the limitations, liberty, and culpability that the two main characters face, each reader can interpret each section inversely. Reference Winterson, J. (2006). Weight (2005). Toronto: Vintage Canada. How to cite Jeannette Winterson Weight, Papers

Does The UK Political System Tend Towards free essay sample

Conflict Or Consensus Essay, Research Paper In order to hold a stable authorities it is of import to hold consensus. ? Consensus is a general apprehension and understanding on cardinal principles. ? In political relations there are three chief types of consensus, Societal Consensus, Political Consensus and consensus in policy making.Societal consensus is overall public sentiment, the political beliefs of the public. ? Normally most people? s political sentiments are non excessively diverse, the bulk falling someplace around the Centre ground. ? The country of the political spectrum where the majority of the populace? s sentiment lies is called the consensus. ? To acquire elected, a political party must besides fall in this country, in order to appeal to the public.Therefore the chief political parties all have policies that are similar, as they all want to appeal to the public. ? This is Political Consensus. ? The parties may still differ over certain policies or issues, but on cardinal issues their policies are really similar. ? If a party was to present policies that were outside the consensus, they would lose popularity and would non be elected. ? This means that authoritiess frequently continue the policies of their predecessor.Consensus in policy devising is the pattern of affecting other groups in finding policies, in add-on to the cabinet. ? This may be Trade Unions, force per unit area groups or other appropriate group.Historically Britain has enjoyed consensus political relations. ? Following the Second World War a consensus between the chief political parties developed. ? There was a clime of co-operation between Labour and Conservatives following their alliance authorities during the war and the parties agreed in certain cardinal areas. ? Both parties accepted Keynesianism, an economic sciences system that bridged Capitalism and socialism, reasoning for full employment brought about by authorities intercession in the economy. ? There was cross-party support for the study by William Beveridge naming for a? Welfare State? The Labour authorities of 1945, led by Clement Atlee introduced policies in six key countries, which became the foundation for the post-war consensus. ? These were # 8211 ; the committedness to full employment, utilizing Keynesian economic thoughts to accomplish it. ? To hold a assorted economic system, including both publically and in private owned industries. ? The debut of a? Welfare State? , with the constitution of the NHS and benefits for those in need. ? The formalization of links with Trade Unions, affecting them in policy making. ? The committedness to cut downing the spread between the rich and hapless and to assist parts with economic problems. ? The committedness to NATO and to do Britain a atomic power, keeping close ties to America.In 1951 the Conservative Party was elected and although there were some minor alterations, they continued the policies of the old Labour Government. ? They merely had a really little bulk and so had to govern out any unpopular policies. ? This meant maintaining most of Labours policies. ? The Conservative Party leading was moderate and the more rightist MPs were marginalised. ? The Tories hence had no pick or so no desire to alter the policies started by Labour.The Conservative economic policy was so similar to Labor? s old one that the phrase? Butskellism? was coined after R.A. Butler the Tory Chancellor of the Exchequer and Hugh Gateskell the Chancellor of the Exchequer under Labour. ? Centrists succeeded Churchill as Prime Minister and so these consensus policies were continued. ? They remained unchanged when Labour came to power in 1964.The consensus policies had remained undisputed until the 1970? s when they began to be put under pressure. ? When Edward Heath came to power in 1970, he did so with a committedness to more rightist policies, such as restricting the power of the Unions, cut downing province control of industry and advancing the free market. ? However in 1972 as unemployment rose to over one million and his policies became less popular he did a? U-turn? . ? He abandoned his rightist policies and adopted more consensus policies ; he even adopted some leftist policies such as nationalisation. ? However despite continued audience and engagement of the Unions, it was the Unions who brought down his authorities in 1974 with the mineworker strike.This followed by a labour authorities, but they merely had a bantam bulk of 3 seats. ? This meant that the Labour authorities had to lt ;< p>pursue moderate policies despite force per unit area to present extremist left-wing policies. ? It had to give up on Keynesian economic sciences because of economic jobs, doing differences with Unions. ? This led to the? Winter of Discontentment? . ? This was when public sector workers brought the state to a base still by widespread strikes. ? They were really unpopular and the populace called for Union power to be curbed.This spelled the terminal for the post-war consensus as on the dorsum of this populace dissatisfaction Margaret Thatcher came to power with extremist right-wing policies. ? She abandoned Keynesianism in favor of Monetarism and the free market. ? She severed links with the brotherhoods and took off much of their power. ? She did non prosecute full employment, and did non see it as the authorities? s duty to decrease inequality, alternatively seeing it as an inducement to work harder. ? She was nevertheless unable to drastically reform the public assistance province as it had broad dispersed public support. ? Foreign and defense mechanism policy was continued with support for NATO and the atomic deterrent. ? During this clip Labour moved further left outside of the social consensus, doing itself unelectable. ? Mrs Thatcher? s old ages in authorities saw much struggle, with societal agitation and inner-city public violences in 1981 and 1985 and the Poll-Tax presentations in 1989.With the election of John Major more moderate policies were followed and today a new consensus has emerged to the right of the old one, with Tony Blair and his so called? Third Way? go oning many policies that would non hold seemed out of topographic point in Thatcher? s or Major? s authoritiess. ? His belief in? inclusive? political relations has seen him abandon many traditional socialist Labour thoughts and follow traditional Tory ones. ? The new consensus could be described as non an ideological consensus but as a matter-of-fact consensus, based around single issues as they arise instead than deep-rooted political beliefs.New Labours policies of privatizing air-traffic control and its committedness to cutting revenue enhancement are in line with Tory beliefs, but there are still many points on which New Labour and the Conservative Don? T agree. ? The EU and the Euro is a major beginning of dissension in British political relations with the Conservatives stanchly Euro-sceptic and against the individual currency with New Labour in favor. ? However even this dissentious issue has brought about a consensus, one between New Labour, the Lib Dems and heretical Tories, in the Britain in Europe group.There are nevertheless many struggles today in Britain, the obvious one being in Northern Ireland, with the problems get downing in 1969 and holding been a beginning of serious struggle of all time since. ? The force between Loyalists and Republicans within Northern Ireland and the IRA panic run on the mainland have been the chief menace to Britain? s internal security for many years. ? There are besides many other beginnings of struggle in Britain today, including the Anti-Hunt anteroom and the Countryside confederation and the Anti-capitalist public violence in London in the summer. ? There are many administrations that may present a menace in the hereafter such as the ALF, Reclaim the Streets and Earth First. ? A possible beginning of future struggle could be Scots and Welsh devolution. ? This may in fact weaken the brotherhood non beef up it as English bitterness at non holding an English parliament grows and as Scots and to a lesser extent Welsh patriotism grows in popularity.Despite these beginnings of struggle, British political relations tends largely towards consensus, since there is an understanding amongst both the populace and the major political parties on the cardinal issues, such as the belief in the being of a National Health Service and benefits. ? Britain has a stable authorities with no hazard of being overthrown. ? This is because the public recognises the authorities? s right to regulate even if they don? Ts agree with what the authorities is doing. ? The public accepts the democratic rule and therefore the authorities has legitimacy. ? There is no party that wishes to drastically alter the political system, although New Labour has introduced the reform of the House of Lords and limited electoral reform, but this is non excessively drastic. ? This is helped by Britain? s chiefly two party system as this keeps utmost parties out of parliament. ? The new consensus does non look to hold any major oppositions and so it is likely to go on good in to the following century.